Loss of Planetary Tilt Could Doom Alien Life
The driver of our seasons is the slight "lean" Earth has in its rotational axis as it revolves around the Sun, known as axial tilt or obliquity. According to René Heller, a postdoctoral research associate at the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics in Potsdam, Germany, astrobiologists have not yet paid much attention to this variable in gauging the possibility for alien life to exist on distant planets.
"Obliquity and seasonal aspects are an important issue in understanding exoplanet habitability that has mostly been neglected so far," said Heller.
To address this gap, Heller and his colleagues published two papers recently looking at how the gravitational interactions of stars and planets eventually erode a planet's axial tilt. The findings do not bode well for planets residing in the habitable, or "Goldilocks" zones around red stars smaller than the Sun. These zones are the just-right temperature bands wherein water can remain liquid on the surface of a planet.
According to computer simulations, red dwarf stars quickly erase the axial tilt of habitable, Earth-like exoplanets. This temperature-moderating tilt is nullified in such a short time that life may never have a chance to get going. An exoplanet that fits this barren scenario is Gliese 581 d, usually considered one of the best candidates for life.
On the other hand, terrestrial planets around Sun-like stars fare much better. These worlds should not see their axial tilts erode to dangerously low levels until many billions of years down the road, well after life has arisen and possibly evolved into technological civilizations. A planetary abode representing this scenario is Kepler 22-b, the first near-Earth-sized world discovered in a habitable zone by NASA's planet-hunting Kepler space telescope.
A tale of the seasons
To envision obliquity, think of the tilt on a spinning desktop globe. Obliquity is measured as the angle that a planet's poles are offset from being perpendicular to the plane of the planet's orbit around a star. Earth's obliquity is presently about 23.5 degrees, although how it might have changed over geological time is a matter of debate. Planets get their obliquity from a number of factors, including impacts from objects early in a solar system's history, stars passing by and the gravitational influences of other planets.
Overall, Earth's obliquity coupled with daily axial rotations bathe the world in a smooth distribution of temperatures. The peak highs and lows do not exceed about 200 degrees Fahrenheit in variance.
From pleasant to apocalyptic?
But take away the Earth's axial slant, and the place might become a lot less inviting.
With an obliquity of less than five degrees or so, an Earth-like planet's broader equatorial regions bear the full brunt of a sun's radiance. The polar regions also receive far less sunlight than they do with seasonal ebbs and flows. The result: extreme temperature gradients based on latitude. "Your equator is heated enormously while the poles freeze," said Heller.
In theory, bands of habitability in temperate, mid-latitude zones could persist. In a worst-case scenario, however, the entire atmosphere of a zero-obliquity planet could collapse, Heller said. Gases might evaporate into space around the planet's blazing middle and freeze to the ground in the bleak north and south.
Life, had it ever emerged, would be stopped dead in its tracks.
Such a fate could have befallen Gliese 581 d, according to calculations by Heller and his colleagues.
They modeled how the gravitational dance between a star and a planet grinds away at any obliquity the planet might possess. This process, dubbed "tilt erosion," happens because a star's gravity pulls more on the side of the planet nearest it. That attraction deforms the planet into a slightly non-spherical shape, with tidal bulges pointed toward and away from the Sun. On Earth, we experience a similar effect, where the nearby Moon's gravity gives the Earth's oceans their tides. The misalignment between the two bodies' centers of gravity imparts a torque to the planet. "This torque tends to align the tidal bulge with the two centers of mass," explained Heller. Over time, this mechanism forces the planet into a zero-obliquity equilibrium.
For relatively cool, dim stars with less than half the Sun's mass, the obliquity window becomes quite narrow. That is because exoplanets must reside in tight, Mercury-like or closer orbits around red dwarfs in order to collect enough heat and sunlight to power biological beings. At these short distances, a star exerts strong tidal effects, Heller said.
Lifeless under a red sun
As it turns out, for an Earth-like planet in the habitable zone of a star with a quarter of the Sun's mass, obliquity is eliminated in less than 100 million years. In fact, only terrestrial planets orbiting in the habitable zones of stars with about 90 percent of the Sun's mass can hang on to an appreciable obliquity for more than a billion years.
"We found that extrasolar terrestrial planets in the habitable zone of low-mass stars lose their primordial obliquities on time scales much shorter than life required to evolve on Earth," said Heller.
The obliquities for "super-Earths" – worlds several to 10 times the mass of the Earth – would also rapidly vanish around red dwarfs. The super-Earth Gliese 581 d orbits a red star with just 31 percent of the Sun's mass, and the system is reckoned to be perhaps twice the Sun's age at about 9 billion years. As a result, Gliese 581 d should have lost its axial tilt long ago.
Yet for habitable planets around Sun-like stars, obliquity loss caused by tidal interactions with the star should not be a show-stopper. Compared to red dwarfs, the habitable zone is anywhere from two to three times farther out from a warmer, brighter star like our own, and at that distance tidal forces are much weaker, said Heller.
That means Kepler-22b, among the most Earth-like exoplanets yet found, might bask in its own version of the four classic seasons. "Our results suggest that this planet would still have its initial obliquity, and therefore could experience seasons," said Heller.
The example of our own planet would seem to bear this likelihood out, of course. But the picture is indeed a lot more complicated, Heller points out.
Quite a number of astronomical phenomena can alter the rotation of a planet on its axis, including the presence of a moon and the gravitational influences of other planets. In our solar system, the biggest bully on the block is Jupiter, whose gravity can disturb planet's axial tilts. Studies have suggested that our relatively large moon has balanced Earth against this force, thereby limiting axial wobbling and preserving the planet's obliquity over long periods of time.
For an opposite case, consider Mars. Hulking Jupiter wreaks havoc with the Red Planet's obliquity, causing it to vary by perhaps as much as 60 degrees over the course of a million years, Heller said. Those disturbances lead to big swings in global temperatures and glacier cover, and on more habitable worlds that sort of climatic chaos could spell the end for life.
Yet big moons might not be a saving grace for habitable-zone, terrestrial worlds around red dwarfs. The habitable planet's necessary close proximity to a dim star could destabilize lunar orbits, said Caleb Scharf, director of Columbia University's multidisciplinary Astrobiology Center, who was not involved in Heller's research.
Getting a bead on tilt
For now, knowing the true states of both Gliese 581 d and Kepler-22b will have to wait. Gauging an exoplanet's obliquity, especially a terrestrial-sized world's, remains a tricky feat given today's instrument technology. "The obliquity of exoplanets is essentially an unknown at this time," said Scharf.
Overall, understanding how obliquity is lost, gained and ultimately steers climates will continue to keep scientists very busy. "Obliquity is definitely a very important variable," said Scharf. Depending upon a range of other habitability factors, Scharf said that "obliquity can certainly end up being the critical lynchpin of determining whether or not any part of a planet could be considered habitable."