Earth-Sized Planets Common in the Galaxy
It shows that 17 percent of all Sun-like stars have planets one to two times the diameter of Earth orbiting close to their host stars, according to a team of astronomers from the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Hawaii at Manoa.
This estimate includes only planets that circle their stars within a distance of about one-quarter of Earth’s orbital radius -- well within the orbit of Mercury -- that is the current limit of Kepler’s detection capability. Further evidence suggests that the fraction of stars having planets the size of Earth or slightly bigger orbiting within Earth-like orbits may amount to 50 percent.
The team -- UC Berkeley graduate student Erik Petigura, former UC Berkeley post-doctoral fellow Andrew Howard, now on the faculty of the Institute for Astronomy at the University of Hawaii, and UC Berkeley professor of astronomy Geoff Marcy -- reported their findings on Tuesday, Jan. 8, at a session on the Kepler mission during the American Astronomical Society meeting in Long Beach, Calif.
“Our key result is that the frequency of planets increases as you go to smaller sizes, but it doesn’t increase all the way to Earth-size planets -- it stays at a constant level below twice the diameter of Earth,” Howard said.
Planets one to two times the size of Earth are not necessarily habitable. Painstaking observations by Petigura’s team show that planets two or three times the diameter of Earth are typically like Uranus and Neptune, which have a rocky core surrounded by helium and hydrogen gases and perhaps water. Planets close to the star may even be water worlds -- planets with oceans hundreds of miles deep above a rocky core.
“Kepler’s one goal is to answer a question that people have been asking since the days of Aristotle: What fraction of stars like the Sun have an Earth-like planet?” Howard said. “We’re not there yet, but Kepler has found enough planets that we can make statistical estimates.”
The estimates are based on a better understanding of the percentage of big Earth-size planets that Kepler misses because of uncertainties in detection, which the team estimates to be about one in four, or 25 percent.
To find planets, the Kepler telescope captures repeated images of 150,000 stars in a region of the sky in the constellation Cygnus. The data are analyzed by computer software -- the “pipeline” -- in search of stars that dim briefly as a result of a planet passing in front, called a transit. For planets as large as Jupiter, the star may dim by 1 percent, or one part in 100, which is easily detectable. A planet as small as Earth, however, dims the star by one part in 10,000, which is likely to be lost in the noise, Petigura said.
Petigura spent the past two years writing a software program called TERRA, for Transiting ExoEarth Robust Reduction Algorithm, which is very similar to Kepler’s pipeline. The UC Berkeley/Hawaii team then fed TERRA simulated planets to test how efficiently the software detects Earth-size planets.
“It may seem crazy to spend two years redoing what the Kepler team has already done, but the question we are asking -- How many Earth-size planets are we missing? -- is so important that we wanted to do it separately for cross-validation,” he said.
“Erik is really brilliant,” said Marcy, who was Petigura’s research mentor when he was still a UC Berkeley undergraduate student. “He has single handedly written data analysis software from scratch, drawing upon the NASA Kepler team’s expertise with its pipeline. The more people working on this, the more independent analyzes, the better.”
The analysis confirmed that the frequency of planets increases as the size decreases, which Howard and the Kepler team reported last year. Perhaps 1 percent of stars have planets the size of Jupiter, while 10 percent have planets the size of Neptune. Marcy compared this to rocks on a beach -- large boulders are rare, stones are more common, and pebbles extremely abundant.
Unlike the beach, where sand grains and flecks are even more abundant, Petigura’s team now estimates that the abundance of planets stops rising at about twice Earth’s diameter and remains the same until the size of Earth, the limit of their analysis. This corrects an impression left by Howard’s earlier paper that the frequency of Earth-size planets actually decreases below twice Earth’s diameter.
“A year ago, Kepler had found only a few planets smaller than twice Earth’s diameter, far fewer than would be expected if you extrapolate downward from the abundances of larger planets,” Petigura said. Accounting for planets that Kepler misses still means that “big Earths” are one third as abundant as would be expected if the rising trend continued below twice the diameter of Earth.
Howard noted, however, that if 17 percent of all stars have Earth-size planets within the orbit of Mercury, “where are they in our solar system? Maybe our solar system is an anomaly compared to the great variety of stars.”
Petigura’s work was supported by a National Science Foundation graduate student fellowship.